Why 256-bit Encryption is Better Than 128-bit Encryption

Why 256-bit Encryption is Better Than 128-bit Encryption

Encryption is essential for protecting data and communications in our digital world. Encryption algorithms use a key to transform readable data into unreadable ciphertext. The longer the key, the harder it is to crack the encryption. That's why experts now recommend using 256-bit encryption keys over 128-bit keys for most uses.

Key Length: What It Means

Encryption key length refers to the number of bits in the key. A bit is a basic unit of digital information (a 0 or a 1). Longer keys offer more possible combinations, making it vastly harder to guess the correct key through a brute force attack.

  • 128-bit key: 2^128 (over 3.4 x 10^38) possible keys
  • 256-bit key: 2^256 (approximately 1.1 x 10^77) possible keys

Cracking Encryption in Practice

While no known brute-force attacks have successfully cracked 128-bit encryption, its vulnerability has been shown:

  • In 2009, researchers used a partial known plaintext attack to break a 128-bit AES key in just 9 days using hundreds of GPUs.
  • In 2011, the Dutch government reported that 128-bit keys protecting European Union passports could be cracked in just a few weeks and recommended moving to 256-bit keys.

So while 128-bit keys are not yet trivial to crack, their vulnerability has been demonstrated. 256-bit keys are exponentially harder to brute force as of today.

Recommendations for Key Length

Here are some recommendations on encryption key length from security experts:

  • NIST: Recommends using a minimum of 128-bit keys through 2030. But for very sensitive data, they recommend considering 256-bit keys or larger.
  • ENISA: Recommends at least 128-bit keys for symmetric encryption through 2022, and transitioning to 256-bit keys thereafter. For public key encryption, they recommend transitioning to 3,072-bit keys.
  • ECRYPT: Recommends 256-bit or higher keys for symmetric encryption. For new applications, they recommend asymmetric keys equivalent in strength to symmetric 256-bit keys.
  • Bruce Schneier (security expert): Recommends 256-bit keys for new systems and suggests most software should increase key lengths in future revisions.

When 256-bit Encryption is Overkill

While 256-bit encryption is stronger, it does have downsides. Encryption has a performance cost, so using such a long key can slow things down. The larger key sizes also require more storage space.

As such, here are some cases when 128-bit encryption may still suffice:

  • Low value data with a short shelf life - e.g. temporary text messages
  • Latency sensitive applications like voice or video chat
  • Embedded systems with limited processor power or memory

However, many modern systems should be able to handle 256-bit encryption without significant slow-down. The advantages of much stronger security often outweigh the minor performance hits.

Where 256-bit Encryption Shines

Here are some examples of 256-bit encryption being used to protect sensitive data and communications:

  • VPN tunnels: AES-256 encryption in protocols like OpenVPN, Wireguard
  • Websites: HTTPS using 256-bit TLS for secure browsing
  • Hard drives: VeraCrypt, BitLocker for full disk encryption
  • Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin's 256-bit addresses and signatures
  • Messaging apps: End-to-end encryption in WhatsApp, Signal.


256-bit encryption is significantly stronger than 128-bit against brute force attacks. Security organizations recommend upgrading to 256-bit as the new security standard. While 128-bit has niche uses, the performance impact of 256-bit is often negligible on modern systems, making it the clear choice for robust data protection.